tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35849993.post7914172905594892719..comments2023-10-14T21:05:30.573+09:00Comments on View from the fence: D-war: the round-eye viewUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35849993.post-6454511592053615762007-08-15T13:26:00.000+09:002007-08-15T13:26:00.000+09:00Well, I would agree that if a 'serpent' or 'dragon...Well, I would agree that if a 'serpent' or 'dragon' resembles a snake or lizard then they definately got it right. It was at least as good as the snakes in Anaconda or any of the creatures in the Lord of the Rings trilogy. Both dragon and serpent looked as realistic as one could expect such a thing to be. That was one of the aspects of the movie that was actually close to believable<BR/>If you want an interesting take on the whole dragon thing try to get ahold of the dragon documentary on the discovery channel. Apparently, the dragon is a fairly consistent legend across cultures but as I said in the review....suspension of disbelief is necessary for the entire viewing process.Fenceriderhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07529325305679031930noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35849993.post-6418903371082401132007-08-15T00:09:00.000+09:002007-08-15T00:09:00.000+09:00I liked the review in the Joong Ang daily . It sai...I liked the review in the Joong Ang daily . It said what a 'realistic dragon' it was.. err what exactly were they comparing it with?Jon Allenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15589729363368420598noreply@blogger.com